Now nearly 10 days out from Park City and this year's anniversary edition of the vital US independent film mecca is beginning to come into sharper focus. What we were sensing mid-week - the gathering word-of-mouth buzz that the fest was coming up short (at very least in comparison to 2008's remarkable lineup of WIRE, TROUBLE, MYTHS, POLANSKI, BETRAYAL, ANVIL and many others) has continued to play out as everyone returned from the high altitude.
News broke Monday afternoon on what will likely go down as the fest's biggest sale - a multi-layered deal for the Narrative Competition winner PUSH: BASED ON THE NOVEL BY SAPPHIRE that involved LionsGate, Tyler Perry and Oprah Winfrey. The $5.5 million deal was the result of some fancy footwork by sales rep kingpin Cinetic Media, as indieWIRE's Eugene Hernandez reported:
"'This a return to what Sundance is supposed to be as a market,” an
enthused John Sloss from Cinetic told indieWIRE today, elaborating a
strategy that included screening the movie at the Magic Johnson theater
in Harlem days before it’s Sundance world premiere. Buoyed by an 80%
definite recommend rating out of the Harlem showing, they battled an
unfortunate first screening time that had PUSH playing against
Antoine Fuqua’s BROOKLYN'S FINEST.
By awards night last Saturday at Sundance, Lee Daniels and Cinetic had
enlisted the support of Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry, who watched the
movie prior to the festival. They then spent the week putting together
a deal, with the Lionsgate team at Cinetic’s New York office to close
the deal. Winfrey will support the release through her Harpo Films,
while this will be the first movie affiliated with Perry’s 34th Street
banner."
The PUSH sale marks a business-side highlight for the festival, which began with a number of hot titles that didn't attract the attention or buyers that they had hoped. Among these, the Micheal Cera/Charlene Yi-starring hybrid film PAPER HEART.
Most of the Sundance 2009 docs that were looking for a theatrical deal are still in the hunt. Arthouse Films made deals last week for two documentary competition titles - ART & COPY and WILLIAM KUNTSLER: DISTURBING THE UNIVERSE and to date, that's all she wrote. Granted, many of the films already had a television home waiting for them (counts vary, but HBO seems to have had as many as 7 films amongst the two competitive documentary sections), but even many of those films were holding out hope for a theatrical run.
However, one must keep in mind that the biggest doc to emerge from Sundance 2008 - James Marsh's MAN ON WIRE, didn't close its deal with Magnolia until a couple weeks after the fest was over. A number of films are said to be in ongoing talks with distributors, including RJ Cutler's THE SEPTEMBER ISSUE and Grand Jury Prize winner WE LIVE IN PUBLIC from director Ondi Timoner. We will likely hear more about those films and others in the coming weeks.
Also worth watching are the films themselves - particularly whether (or should we say how much) some of them will change in the months to come. Tweaks, both large and small, are nothing new following major festival premieres. Last year alone, Oscar nominee THE BETRAYAL (NERAKHOON) and shortlisted film I.O.U.S.A. both underwent revisions between their Park City premiere and the eventual theatrical release. In his Sundance summary on the Stranger Than Fiction blog, Thom Powers notes that one of the World Cinema award winners is already planning on heading back into the edit suite:
"(BIG RIVER MAN Director John) Maringouin told me after the awards that
he’s still not finished. He intends to go back to the edit room where I
expect he’ll make a strong film even stronger."
Agnes Varnum, who came to Sundance for the second time, offered a pointed (and on-point) critique of this year's festival, questioning the fest's reliance this year on films that already had a home:
"My impression of more recent years, before I attended, was that it was
an over-hyped, corporate A-list party. But it isn’t really either of
those things… for me. The work is solid. Too solid. While there are
more filmmakers than I can name off the top of my head whose new work
was presented and I was as eager as anyone to see, there were few
surprises. As many others are saying, I appreciated the mellow
atmosphere so I didn’t have to fight crowds or miss out on screenings I
really wanted (except THE SEPTEMBER ISSUE) but there wasn’t any film that wowed me with its exceptionalism.
As a friend pointed out, why do we need to trek all the way to Sundance to see films made for HBO or American Experience or Sony Pictures
Classics or Focus Features? This is work we will be able to see,
despite Redford and long-time Sundance fellows’ comments to the contrary in the festival’s opening trailer shown before each screening. Sundance might once have been a spot where you could see work that you couldn’t
see anywhere else, but with so many movies already poised for
distribution, everyone will have the ability to see them in the coming
year. That is a great thing for the filmmakers and audiences who will
enjoy such well made films, but where is the heady experimentation or
shock or freshly inspired work?"
Recent Comments